Forget Oil: This 7.6% Dividend Will Soar In 2019

| April 10, 2019 | 0 Comments

Oil prices have been locked in a tight range for five years—and I know I don’t have to tell you that this has been a disaster for energy investors.

Oil Fails to Launch

Energy Select Sector SPDR

With the benchmark Energy Select Sector SPDR (XLE) unable to hold its gains for long (let alone recover to pre-crash levels), even the most conservative energy investor has been clobbered.

Why is this happening?

After all, you’d think a growing global population and emerging-market growth would drive up the price of a limited resource like oil. But the tables have turned. I’ll get into why shortly.

These Dividend Payers Are Better Buys Than Oil

For now, though, I recommend that income-seekers go a different route and pick stocks (and closed-end funds [CEFs]) that benefit from cheaper oil and gas—like utilities.

The reason is simple: these companies will pay less to fuel their plants, driving up their profit margins—and their dividend payouts, too.

So what’s the best way to buy in?

You could choose a utility ETF, like the Utilities Sector SPDR Fund (XLU). With a 3% yield, it pays 70% more than an index fund like the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY).

But my favorite method probably won’t surprise you: CEFs! The Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund (UTF), for example, pays a 7.6% dividend now, while trading at a 4.6% discount to net asset value (NAV, or what it’s underlying portfolio is worth). It also holds major electric utilities like NextEra Energy (NEE) and Atmos Energy (ATO).

What’s Weighing on Oil

Now let’s dive into some of the other issues that are bound to keep energy down for a long time to come.

Energy Efficiency: Oil’s Nemesis

We hear a lot about alternative fuels these days, but if you’re reading this, you’re still likely using more power generated by oil, coal and nuclear power than wind and solar.

The real story is a bit more boring: people are simply using less energy—and utilities are learning to provide more power with less energy inputs, raising their profit margins.

A European Union study, for example, found that more efficient thermal-power production meant less energy needed to be used to satisfy consumers’ needs. The trend was nowhere near slowing:

Europe’s Lean Energy Machines

The same trend holds in the US, where from 1980 to 2014, the fuel economy of vehicles fell by over 25%, industrial energy efficiency rose 40%, and lost energy from transport fell by 25%, according to the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy.

And if you’re looking for China for growth, think again. It’s getting better at using energy, too.

Chinese Power Consumption Falls Relative to Economic Growth

Note the one line going down? That’s the ratio of total produced energy to GDP, indicating that China has been more efficient in its use of energy (the IEC estimates energy production to GDP fell by over 3% in 2018, continuing the trend).

Another problem for oil bulls: population growth is slowing.

A (Slower) Growing Population

With slower population growth, the natural growth of energy demand will slow, as well. Meantime, alternative-energy costs are tanking, making it easier to replace oil with other fuels.

Solar Gets Cheaper …

The continued decline in solar-power costs has helped keep solar installations growing over the last decade. The cost of wind-power production has also been on a steady decline since 2008:

… And so Does Wind

While alternatives still face a few hurdles (the largest of which is storage), it’s clear that lower costs for alternative fuels will mean companies and consumers will choose them more often, creating another headwind for oil.

Action to Take: Avoid Oil

While oil companies can pivot to alternative energies (Royal Dutch Shell [RDS] has been particularly good on this front), the transition is slow and full of risks that constantly need to be repriced in. RDS said it will likely spend between $1 billion and $2 billion on alternative energy per year in 2019, which is just 4.3% of the company’s operating expenses in 2018 and 0.4% of its annual revenues.

But RDS’s sales still depend on oil prices, and little has changed in the last five years; the company’s 2018 revenues were still down 7.8% since 2014.

The bottom line? These companies are clearly not set for a future of steadily declining oil demand, and we need to invest for the future, not the past. The risks of betting on oil firms turning around are simply too high.

Forget Oil: Buy These 15 Amazing 7.5%+ Dividends Instead

Right now I’m pounding the table on no less than 15 funds throwing off some of the juiciest yields on the market (including one “unicorn” paying an outsized 9.9% payout!).

And before you ask, no, not a single one is an energy fund. And yes, you do get plenty of exposure to utilities—the stocks in the very best position to cash in on oil’s weakness.

Better yet, these 15 cash machines are primed for double-digit gains in the coming 12 months! And I’ll give you the names of all 15 when you take a no-risk trial to my CEF Insider service today.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Category: Closed-End Funds (CEFs)

About the Author ()

Michael Foster is an Investment Strategist at Contrarian Outlook.

Please Leave a Comment